India should lead in solving Jihadi problem

While the following guest contribution from Hem Raj Jain is not directly linked to the events in Ukraine or Russia, it is however connected to the plan of establishing a common Russo-Indian state (RUSIND) as explained here and here. Also the potential spread of ISIS ideology into the area of the Russian Federation – especially after Western withdrawal from Afghanistan – forms a security threat for Russia which it might solve best together with India as some believe. The guest contribution generally proposes a greater engagement of India – a country with a large muslim population – in dealing with radical Islamic ideologies. Concretely a stronger Indian involvement in solving the Syrian conflict is wished, which again affects Russia’s interests as supporter of Assad’s regime and in regard of Russia’s only naval base in the Mediterranean Sea in Tartus.

Editions/comments by Novorossiya News are in curly brackets { }.

Instead of shedding crocodile tears over killing of French journalists, India should take the lead in solving Jihadi problem

Sub:- (i)- Time to call the bluff that presently practiced Islam is a religion of peace and harmony (ii)- India of PM Modi under influence of Sangh Parivar {Sangh Parivar – Hindu nationalist movement} can be coaxed to take the lead to become ‘Vishva Guru’ (World’s en-lightener)  by solving ISIS / Jihadi problem (iii)- Better if India involves SAARC {SAARC – South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation} in this mission as it will establish leadership of India in SAARC

Notwithstanding the attempt of a section of media [to rationalize the terrorist attack by Jihadis on French satirical magazine ‘Charlie Hebdo’ on Wednesday (in which 12 persons including 10 journalists) were killed that this killing was the result of repeated caricature of Islam by this magazine], this terrorist attack involves two major issues / global problems. First the freedom of expression and second the menace of Jihad which is disturbing the peace and harmony of entire mankind. People should not be surprised if India takes the lead or rather should take the lead in solving these problems as explained below :-

(1)-  In modern world freedom of expression has acquired wider meaning. Nowadays so many expressions which were considered seditious, harmful etc are considered no more so. When controversy erupted over allegedly a blasphemous video (produced in USA) on Prophet Muhammad, demonstrations took place by Muslims all over the world in which hundreds of Muslims were killed. At that time US President Obama was right in refusing to ban this video by saying at UN in 2012 that – “At a time when anyone with a cell phone can spread offensive views around the world with the click of a button, the notion that we can control the flow of information is obsolete”. Obama further said that – “Americans have fought and died around the globe to protect the right of all people to express their views, even views that we profoundly disagree with.  We do not do so because we support hateful speech, but because our founders understood that without such protections, the capacity of each individual to express their own views and practice their own faith may be threatened.  We do so because in a diverse society, efforts to restrict speech can quickly become a tool to silence critics and oppress minorities.”

(2)- Media first reported that Al-Queda carried out this Wednesday terrorist attack in Paris and then reported that ISIS took the responsibility. But it hardly matters because they are two sides of the same coin namely  ‘the Jihadi mindset’. Notwithstanding the attempt of Muslims all over the world to fool the people that Jihad has different (laudable)  meaning in Islam, if entire mankind does not do anything to eliminate this ‘modern version of Jihad’ then it may be too late.

(3)- No doubt any body who ever came in contact with Quran (the basis of Islam) knows that it is capable of preparing its practitioners competent enough to deal with the problems & issues of this and other world. But it is time to call the bluff of Muslims all over the world that the Islam (as PRESENTLY BEING PRACTICED under un-creative and non-modernizing clergy) is a religion of peace and harmony. Therefore rest of the world should not listen to laments of Muslims and should try to discipline this Jihadi mindset which finds its breeding and sustaining ground among the wider and so-called peace-loving Muslim population all over the world.

(4)- Whether Muslims like it or not but – if they could spread Islam in different parts of the world with the power of sword and with huge bloodshed and killings and with unspeakable atrocities on so-called ‘Qafirs’ (the non-believers)- then there is no reason why rest of the world should not discipline Jihadi promoting and sustaining Muslims all over the world through UNEC {United Nations Election Commission} and mostly mild use of sanctioned physical coercion by UNPKF {United Nations peace keeping forces}.

(5)- But now it is evident that said 2012 UN speech was merely a professorial speech of Obama because he still remain in delusional mode where he naively believes that this Jihadi mindset (manifested in ISIS phenomenon too) can be eliminated without boots on ground in Syria and Iraq. The role of other veto powers in this matter is less said the better. Therefore India (with ~ 250 million Muslim population) of PM Modi under influence of Sangh Parivar can be coaxed to take the lead to become ‘Vishva Guru’ (World’s en-lightener, which Sangh Parivar namely VHP, RSS, BJP etc {VHP, RSS, BJP – Hindu nationalist organizations/party} is never tired of saying and aspiring) by solving ISIS phenomenon. It will be better if India involves SAARC (which has ~ 700 million Muslims) in this mission which will go a long way in assuring Muslims all over the world about impartiality of this ‘UN Jihadi elimination mission’.

(6)- India should tell UN that it will provide military / para – military (for UN Peace  Keeping Force, UNPKF) and civilian (for assisting UN Election Commission, UNEC) personnel in order to carry out elections in Syria and Iraq after preparing voter lists after getting all the displaced persons / refugees in their respective countries (under a constitution on the basis of Federal, Secular, democratic, Republic, Human rights & capital friendly, globalization with rule of legislated laws). Though so many personnel may not be required but if India could provide ~ 2 million people to Britishers during World War I & II each then there is no reason why present India of ~ 1.25 Billion population (or ~ 1.75 Billion population of SAARC under Indian leadership) can not provide ~ 10 million people to UN  (if needed for bringing peace and succor to Syria & Iraq and to any other troubled country in NAME {North Africa – Middle East}).

(7)- India understands the fact that for the last 30 years India could not get its leadership established in SAARC for the simple reason that India could not satisfy Pakistan on Kashmir issue. Now both India and Pakistan being nuclear power, the solution of Kashmir issue by retrieving POK {Pakistan occupied Kashmir} militarily by India is simply not possible. Therefore by taking the lead in solving Jihadi problem from all over the world (first by mission in NAME especially in Syria and Iraq) by providing people to UN as mentioned above, India ultimately will be able to solve Kashmir problem also, which will usher entire (may be formally unified) SAARC region in unprecedented peace, prosperity and harmony.

It is hoped that remaining mankind will coax India (especially Sangh Parivar which is always very eager to be so coaxed) to constrained Government India to take the lead in solving Jihadi problem from all over the world by contributing people from India (and preferably from SAARC under Indian leadership) to UNPKF and UNEC, as mentioned above.

Hem Raj Jain

(Author of ‘Betrayal of Americanism’)

Bengaluru, (Karnataka) India

Share this article:Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on TumblrShare on RedditDigg thisFlattr the author